While it’s true to say that a good movie doesn’t necessarily have to have a strong story, I think it’s also true to say that if it doesn’t have a strong story, it can’t be considered as the best movie of the year.
And that’s where I am with Dunkirk.
The idea behind it seems to be to immerse the viewer in the sights, sounds and struggles of the British evacuation of Normany during the Second World War, and it certainly does that.
It’s very loud, visually stunning – with some quite superb direction and camera shots – and remarkably tense thanks to its unrelenting incidental music.
I just saw it at a regular cinema but I imagine it’s best seen in an iMax.
But I don’t think it’ll be my favourite movie of the year – and in fact I can already tell you that it’s not – because it lacked enough of a story to hook me in.
The gimmick – presenting three converging timelines – didn’t seem to add up entirely, and even though there was a good reason for it, the lack of dialogue early on became slightly wearing.
So like I say, as an artistic demonstration, this was absolutely top notch, but it failed to capture me from a creative point of view.
Much like Gravity, I think this is one for the cinema that might not translate as well beyond it.
And because of that it can’t be movie of the year.